In any sort of discussion people all have very unique ideas as individuals, and it seems like to me that a lot of the time there is confusion about how to bring unity to diversity.

The trick is that we do not have to be so "all-knowing".

Knowing everything is not necessary nor should anyone have to feel like it is.

What I mean by this is: One person might have a complete way of seeing the world because of their personality type which is unique just to that individual alone. Someone else might see it another way entirely.

Does this mean that they are therefor disagreeable?

If I say I believe in one thing and someone else believes in something else, do they not co-exist?

These ideas can in fact co-exist, and I hope to prove this with my ideas in the future.

I want to bring unity to opposition within the world at both large scale as well as small scale in our cities and towns. I do not see division on any level which to me feels pervasive enough to justify a concept of separation within our world.

Division even between two individuals is usually caused by a misunderstanding or a perceived misunderstanding. With every moment I breathe I am working diligently on coming to a philosophy which propagates and supports diversification of individuals on all levels, towards the end goal of a more cohesive living experience.

I do not have to say the same words as someone else in the same exact way to agree with or share the same belief.

I believe in humanity and the coming days in which we will have a more perfect union as once described in the past.

Towards this end, I myself need to most probably develop myself further so as to be even further capable of containing the space which seems to be "naturally" oppositional.