Apr. 21st, 2021
Apr. 21st, 2021 10:12 am
Social Observation: 1
In any sort of discussion people all have very unique ideas as individuals, and it seems like to me that a lot of the time there is confusion about how to bring unity to diversity.
The trick is that we do not have to be so "all-knowing".
Knowing everything is not necessary nor should anyone have to feel like it is.
What I mean by this is: One person might have a complete way of seeing the world because of their personality type which is unique just to that individual alone. Someone else might see it another way entirely.
Does this mean that they are therefor disagreeable?
If I say I believe in one thing and someone else believes in something else, do they not co-exist?
These ideas can in fact co-exist, and I hope to prove this with my ideas in the future.
I want to bring unity to opposition within the world at both large scale as well as small scale in our cities and towns. I do not see division on any level which to me feels pervasive enough to justify a concept of separation within our world.
Division even between two individuals is usually caused by a misunderstanding or a perceived misunderstanding. With every moment I breathe I am working diligently on coming to a philosophy which propagates and supports diversification of individuals on all levels, towards the end goal of a more cohesive living experience.
I do not have to say the same words as someone else in the same exact way to agree with or share the same belief.
I believe in humanity and the coming days in which we will have a more perfect union as once described in the past.
Towards this end, I myself need to most probably develop myself further so as to be even further capable of containing the space which seems to be "naturally" oppositional.
The trick is that we do not have to be so "all-knowing".
Knowing everything is not necessary nor should anyone have to feel like it is.
What I mean by this is: One person might have a complete way of seeing the world because of their personality type which is unique just to that individual alone. Someone else might see it another way entirely.
Does this mean that they are therefor disagreeable?
If I say I believe in one thing and someone else believes in something else, do they not co-exist?
These ideas can in fact co-exist, and I hope to prove this with my ideas in the future.
I want to bring unity to opposition within the world at both large scale as well as small scale in our cities and towns. I do not see division on any level which to me feels pervasive enough to justify a concept of separation within our world.
Division even between two individuals is usually caused by a misunderstanding or a perceived misunderstanding. With every moment I breathe I am working diligently on coming to a philosophy which propagates and supports diversification of individuals on all levels, towards the end goal of a more cohesive living experience.
I do not have to say the same words as someone else in the same exact way to agree with or share the same belief.
I believe in humanity and the coming days in which we will have a more perfect union as once described in the past.
Towards this end, I myself need to most probably develop myself further so as to be even further capable of containing the space which seems to be "naturally" oppositional.
Tags:
Apr. 21st, 2021 12:11 pm
Dimensional Interactivity
As dimensions increase 1 by 1 the shape of the systemic over-lay is changed.
I'm not sure at what layer Fractals exist but I think that they are either at or well above the 5th dimension.
So... anyone seeing this blog wouldn't know but as part of my spirituality I am coming to realize that my main soul responsibilities are related to dimensional interaction.
As that is the case I am working on coming to a point at which I am able to describe the exact crossing points between dimensions, and the properties of each one.
To be continued...
I'm not sure at what layer Fractals exist but I think that they are either at or well above the 5th dimension.
So... anyone seeing this blog wouldn't know but as part of my spirituality I am coming to realize that my main soul responsibilities are related to dimensional interaction.
As that is the case I am working on coming to a point at which I am able to describe the exact crossing points between dimensions, and the properties of each one.
To be continued...
Apr. 21st, 2021 02:04 pm
Interdimensionality
Continued... hang on, Zero Point.
So. There's a certain number of dimensions n.
If n dimensions, then there needs to be a 0. 0 == NULL
If there are NULL dimensions then there is no dimensional barrier. No. Barrier. Exists.
At Zero Space there are no interruptions between all wavelengths which have or will ever come into being.
If this is true then it's no wonder that Tesla's theory arrived at a way of producing infinite energy, because if there is no barrier between anything then the energy source is a raw and pervasive element.
It is beyond what we can conceive of as Elemental because this energy is totally uninterrupted and thereby unlimited. Any transference of energy will be rendered as if it had never in fact occurred and so, the energy is not depleted but continues to be present due to this fact. Infinite. In Finite. Within a finite boundary.
in·fi·nite
/ˈinfənət/
Origin
late Middle English: from Latin infinitus, from in- ‘not’ + finitus ‘finished, finite’ (see finite).
e·ter·nal
/əˈtərn(ə)l/
Origin
late Middle English: via Old French from late Latin aeternalis, from Latin aeternus, from aevum ‘age’.
e·on
/ˈēən,ˈēˌän/
Origin
mid 17th century: via ecclesiastical Latin from Greek aiōn ‘age’.
TO BE CONT....
So. There's a certain number of dimensions n.
If n dimensions, then there needs to be a 0. 0 == NULL
If there are NULL dimensions then there is no dimensional barrier. No. Barrier. Exists.
At Zero Space there are no interruptions between all wavelengths which have or will ever come into being.
If this is true then it's no wonder that Tesla's theory arrived at a way of producing infinite energy, because if there is no barrier between anything then the energy source is a raw and pervasive element.
It is beyond what we can conceive of as Elemental because this energy is totally uninterrupted and thereby unlimited. Any transference of energy will be rendered as if it had never in fact occurred and so, the energy is not depleted but continues to be present due to this fact. Infinite. In Finite. Within a finite boundary.
in·fi·nite
/ˈinfənət/
Origin
late Middle English: from Latin infinitus, from in- ‘not’ + finitus ‘finished, finite’ (see finite).
e·ter·nal
/əˈtərn(ə)l/
Origin
late Middle English: via Old French from late Latin aeternalis, from Latin aeternus, from aevum ‘age’.
e·on
/ˈēən,ˈēˌän/
Origin
mid 17th century: via ecclesiastical Latin from Greek aiōn ‘age’.
TO BE CONT....